Re: Shared between mod_perl processes?

Hi,

I like to use HTML::Mason for almost everything I do for web, and I use a Mason Component to cache all data I need shared between processes.

It didn't let me down so far.

TheMage
http://themage.bliker.com

Comment on Re: Shared between mod_perl processes?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Shared between mod_perl processes? by BerntB (Deacon) on Aug 20, 2005 at 10:43 UTC
OK, thanks Mason looks good, but seems like overkill for my modest web/html needs. (Hopefully, when/if I reach version 0.3 my ui won't look like 1997-retro. :-) My problem is the size of the user state and the cost to instantiate it at every request. It'll be tolerable now, but if my modest application framework is used for a larger problem, it'll hit the roof. I'll use one of the existing variants (Cache::*, BerkeleyDB, etc) for now. This potential problem can wait until later. Again, thanks everyone, for the answers. I'll try to write my questions better next time so it won't be so confusing. :-)	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: Shared between mod_perl processes?
by BerntB (Deacon) on Aug 20, 2005 at 10:43 UTC

Mason looks good, but seems like overkill for my modest web/html needs. (Hopefully, when/if I reach version 0.3 my ui won't look like 1997-retro. :-)

My problem is the size of the user state and the cost to instantiate it at every request. It'll be tolerable now, but if my modest application framework is used for a larger problem, it'll hit the roof.

I'll use one of the existing variants (Cache::*, BerkeleyDB, etc) for now. This potential problem can wait until later.

Again, thanks everyone, for the answers. I'll try to write my questions better next time so it won't be so confusing. :-)

[reply]