|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Perl Needs Better Tools
by pg (Canon) on Aug 26, 2005 at 03:54 UTC | |
Doesn't matter what one's personal preference is, as an industry trend, I recognize that languages with nice IDE attract programmers and their leaders/managers much easier. If it is less clear how IDE contributed to Java's success, it is certainly one of the key facts that quickly promoted .NET framework, and made it a success. C# is not much different from Java as a language, but Microsoft is certainly very good at providing IDE, especially when the IDE comes from the same vendor that made the language and made the OS. Perl has areas it fits the best, when there are also areas that it just cannot fit in. GUI is one clear example of such area. Without a nice IDE, coding GUI programs with productivity is impossible. A good integrated IDE often increases efficiency in development/debugging/testing. That's another key one needs to consider. But as I said, perl still has areas it fits much better than other languages. Will Perl fade out one day? Remember lots of other languages have extinct already. So will java and C#. That's not a scary thing, on the contrary, it is a good thing to the IT industry. It will be much scary if the entire industry stalls, and everybody stuck with existing technologies (although improvements might be made to them from time to time) | [reply] |
by exussum0 (Vicar) on Aug 26, 2005 at 17:52 UTC | |
Doesn't matter what one's personal preference is, as an industry trend, I recognize that languages with nice IDE attract programmers and their leaders/managers much easier.Developer tools that speed up development make developers happy. If I can use a tool that helps me move functions around, great. It saves me time w/ refactoring. Autocomplete is nice, 'cause though I type 80wpm, I can't remember every (*&$#@ function name in some languages, like php, or java. POD is neat 'cause it's anywhere-readble documentation so long as it's written. JavaDoc requires a webbrowser or an IDE. Fun fun fun if you are using only vim. Yes, i've done java on the command line, no it was for tweaking things.
---- | [reply] |
|
Re: Perl Needs Better Tools
by davidrw (Prior) on Aug 26, 2005 at 02:25 UTC | |
I have discussed the future of Perl with managers from companies that currently use it and find that they worry about the future of Perl. One company I spoke with here in San Francisco is rewriting their core application in Java.Two caveats immediately came to mind reading this. First, "One company" -- out of how many (i.e. sample set)? Does one manager trying to be trendy and buzzword happy for his boss constitute a trend? Second, I wonder how the topic was discussed.. if it was (and i have no idea how it was actually phrased) something like "So, it seems like all the other managers see perl going extinct, what do you think?", that's a lot different than something like "What do you think of the technologies you currently employ?". I just all read things like this (or pretty much anything that provides "stats") with initial skepticism.. but that aside, although my preferred IDE is vi, more tools can't be a bad thing.. | [reply] |
by pg (Canon) on Aug 26, 2005 at 04:05 UTC | |
It might be the right decision for people to convert their Perl application to other languages. For example,
Will I continue to do things in Perl? I will if it fits. Well I do things in other languages? I will if they fit. The bottom line is to do the right thing with the right tool. | [reply] |
|
Re: Perl Needs Better Tools
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Aug 26, 2005 at 03:08 UTC | |
More tools. Automatic version control. Syntax checks. Branch management without command line hacking. Automatic test generation. Yes, please! This though: Perl is in danger of becoming a fading language--new programmers are learning Java and Python in college, and companies like Google hardly use Perl at all. If you are afraid that Perl may be in danger of becoming irrelevant for medium-to-large projects, then read on. Did programmers ever learn Perl formally in school? Almost every Perl hacker I've worked with and know personally is self-taught regardless of whether their background was BSCS or MFA. And the intro amounts to, "Are you scared? Then I've already got you, so read on; otherwise, uh, there's nothing to see here." The tabloids and their televised kin are wrecking style. These were more fun articles today: Perl and PHP Mashup and Search Source Code from Books | [reply] |
by itub (Priest) on Aug 26, 2005 at 03:17 UTC | |
| [reply] |
|
Re: Perl Needs Better Tools
by spiritway (Vicar) on Aug 26, 2005 at 05:17 UTC | |
This article seems to suggest that Perl will stand or fall based on whether it has a nice IDE. Personally, I think its future will depend on its usefulness, not any IDE's that may be written for it. I've used a couple of IDE's for Perl (PerlIDE and Komodo Personal), and they did nothing to help me program better. They were nice, and the access to some of the documentation was marginally better, but really it made almost no difference. Perl is likely to do just fine, with or without an IDE, as long as it remains useful. I cannot imagine it becoming obsolete any time soon, unless someone comes up with a killer language that's a whole lot friendlier than Java (for example). | [reply] |
by adrianh (Chancellor) on Aug 26, 2005 at 22:44 UTC | |
I've used a couple of IDE's for Perl (PerlIDE and Komodo Personal), and they did nothing to help me program better. They were nice, and the access to some of the documentation was marginally better, but really it made almost no difference. And this was the point of the article :-) Perl IDEs are not as useful as those in other languages. See my brief rant for an example of the time you could be saving. I cannot imagine it becoming obsolete any time soon, unless someone comes up with a killer language that's a whole lot friendlier than Java That'll be Ruby and Perl 6 :-) | [reply] |
by sir_lichtkind (Friar) on Aug 26, 2005 at 22:09 UTC | |
>They were nice, and the access to some of the documentation was marginally better, >but really it made almost no difference. that only tells me that the IDE's are not very evolved | [reply] |
|
Re: Perl Needs Better Tools
by tinita (Parson) on Aug 27, 2005 at 10:32 UTC | |
i have been using vim for a couple years now. i've got some useful macros and still there's so much more to learn in vim. i love it. =) about IDEs and co-workers:
they tell me, "hey, this IDE can do X", I yawn "sure, my vim macro can do this, too." just my 2 cents. | [reply] |
|
Re: Perl Needs Better Tools
by sir_lichtkind (Friar) on Aug 26, 2005 at 22:04 UTC | |
my pce at http://proton-ce.sourceforge.net
| [reply] |