Says BrowserUk:
Sorry you feel insulted...
I "feel insulted" because you insulted me. And I don't believe you are sorry.
without a mechanism "... to fix the implementation ...", the idea *is* 'academic'.
I notice that you did not try to defend your insulting characterization of my message as "just hot air".
Which characterization I dispute, by the way. My remark was not "just hot air", nor was it "academic" in the sense that you meant it. I think most of the other people here are thoughtful enough to see that.
| [reply] |
Howdy!
It remains incumbent on the proponent to make the case that the
amount of function calling is actually unnecessary and that
reducing it will actually improve performance on the desired
axis.
Oh, by the way, the gratuitous insult remains on the table. If you
intend to issue an apology, note that you have not done so by the
words you wrote.
| [reply] |