Re^3: literal lists

in reply to Re^2: literal lists
in thread literal lists

I guess because undef in an integer context will be taken as '0' (albeit with a warning if you have asked for warnings), whereas -1 is not a valid array index:

@b = (a .. z);
                                                                      
+          
$#b = undef;
                                                                      
+          
print "@b";
                                                                      
+          
$#b = -1;
                                                                      
+          
print "@b";
[download]

/J\

Comment on Re^3: literal lists Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: literal lists by danmcb (Monk) on Sep 06, 2005 at 12:42 UTC
That makes some sense. -1 is a valid index though, in normal use - it gives you the last element. But in the code you gave, the -1 indeed makes @b an empty array (I didn't know you could do that). Kind of like a quick way to truncate arrays.	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom