in reply to Re: Thorny design problem
in thread Thorny design problem
How about just having a separate perl script for each company? It seems like the modularized approach isn't really doing all that much except managing a namespace and it adds a lot of complexity for little value that I can see.
I'm glad you brought this up. My main reason for using the module approach was so I could test the various internal functions that support the do_it API function. I find that there's a lot more support available for testing functions if they belong to a loadable module, though, admittedly, this rationale has a tail-wagging-the-dog ring to it.
the lowliest monk
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Thorny design problem
by xdg (Monsignor) on Sep 07, 2005 at 22:45 UTC |