Re^4: Application Testing: Custom Module or Perl Test Files?

well, here's a slightly edited script i used to start creating a bundle of modules for a project i'm trying to finish:

#!/usr/bin/perl

use ExtUtils::ModuleMaker;

my $mod = ExtUtils::ModuleMaker->new(
   NAME => 'ConferenceBuilder',
   EXTRA_MODULES => [ { NAME => 'ConferenceBuilder::Foundation' },
            { NAME => 'ConferenceBuilder::Instance' },
            { NAME => 'ConferenceBuilder::Accreditations' },
            { NAME => 'ConferenceBuilder::Products' },
            { NAME => 'ConferenceBuilder::Sessions' },
            { NAME => 'ConferenceBuilder::Addons' },
        ],
   AUTHOR => { NAME =>'geektron', EMAIL => 'me@email.com',
               ORGANIZATION => 'Dis.Organized', WEBSITE => 'http://www
+.perlmonks.org' },
   VERSION => '0.01',
   LICENSE => 'artistic',
    );

$mod->complete_build();
[download]

just chmod it to executable, and run.

it made all the modules in the ConferenceBuilder tree and ConferenceBuilder.pm

Comment on Re^4: Application Testing: Custom Module or Perl Test Files? Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Application Testing: Custom Module or Perl Test Files? by ghenry (Vicar) on Sep 08, 2005 at 21:34 UTC
Ah, that way ;-) Why not add: `PERMISSIONS => '0755';` [download] Then you don't need to chmod it. Walking the road to enlightenment... I found a penguin and a camel on the way..... Fancy a yourname@perl.me.uk? Just ask!!!	[reply] [d/l]
Re^6: Application Testing: Custom Module or Perl Test Files? by geektron (Curate) on Sep 08, 2005 at 22:03 UTC
because it's not the modules that are newly created that need to be executable, it's the actual script that needs to be executable. my umask, of course, doesn't create executables automatically.	[reply]