Re: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform by ikegami (Patriarch) on Sep 23, 2005 at 21:57 UTC
Wouldn't it be Jacques's Transform? But then you end up with too many esses. :)	[reply]
Re^3: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform by parv (Parson) on Sep 23, 2005 at 22:01 UTC
No need to be possessive, neither of Fourier and Laplace were.	[reply]
Re^4: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform by ikegami (Patriarch) on Sep 23, 2005 at 22:04 UTC
Yes, but then it "used" to be called the Schwartzian Transform, not the Schwartz Transform. Just keeping in line with the "old" name :)	[reply]
Re^5: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform by merlyn (Sage) on Sep 23, 2005 at 22:31 UTC
Re^6: Renaming the Schwartzian Transform by ikegami (Patriarch) on Sep 23, 2005 at 23:22 UTC