in reply to Re^3: Suggestion for User Search Page
in thread Suggestion for User Search Page

Okay, bad choice of words.  I should have said "writeups a particular monk had personally originated as opposed to merely responded to."  But yes, you are correct that I was thinking of "root nodes".  I still think it might be nice to have them stand out (in a separate color) but still included with all writeups for a given monk, like this:

Node ID WriteupRep Created
500000 Re^4: Suggestion for User Search Page 3052005-09-22 15:14:22
494122 Re^2: Why aardvarks don't program Perl 52005-09-22 10:04:51
494107 Why aardvarks don't program Perl 22005-09-22 09:39:24
494091 Re^2: The Perl equivalent of Duff's Device 52005-09-22 08:35:46
493449 Re^2: The ternary operator revisited 122005-09-20 09:51:18
493360 Re: An alternative to 'use strict'? 132005-09-20 00:42:30
493359 The ternary operator revisited 112005-09-20 00:35:17
493172 Re^5: Obfuscated, or just badly written? 22005-09-19 10:21:53
493061 Re^4: Reassigning $/ considered harmful 32005-09-18 17:53:54
493048 Re^2: Reassigning $/ considered harmful 12005-09-18 15:34:53
492589 Re: A Mandelbrot in 7 characters -12005-09-16 08:14:56
492477 A Mandelbrot in 7 characters 812005-09-15 12:24:57

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Suggestion for User Search Page
by Tanktalus (Canon) on Sep 23, 2005 at 03:56 UTC

    I trust that anyone who thinks about disturbing my eyes like this will use CSS to let me tone down the colours. Ow.

    That said, I like the picture. Very clear. Bright, but shows clearly your vision. Too bad it's affecting my vision. :-)