Re: RFC: XML::Composer

Consider not putting it in the XML namespace if it doesn't produce valid XML. Data::XMLish perhaps? Either way, please put in lots of big bold warnings explaining why the module shouldn't be used generate valid XML.

-sam

Comment on Re: RFC: XML::Composer

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC: XML::Composer by Ovid (Cardinal) on Sep 30, 2005 at 21:49 UTC
Actually, it can be used to generate perfectly valid XML and it's pretty easy to do. The main thing is that it trusts you to actually know what you're doing. So long as you have decent tests, there shouldn't be a problem. Cheers, Ovid New address of my CGI Course.	[reply]
Re^3: RFC: XML::Composer by samtregar (Abbot) on Sep 30, 2005 at 21:57 UTC
Sure, so can HTML::Template. And with a proper test suite it can make a pretty good XML generator. Does that mean I should rename it XML::Template and recommend it for use producing XML? I don't think so! -sam	[reply]
Re^2: RFC: XML::Composer by duckyd (Hermit) on Oct 03, 2005 at 18:47 UTC
XML::Almost and Data::AlmostXML come to mind as well	[reply]