Re^2: Dispatch table within package question

Presumably, the method which contains the definition of the dispatcher will be called frequently. Is there any performance related disadvantage to this for, say, the case that the dispatcher hash is very large?

And if I did want to define the dispatcher as a member in the constructor along the lines of:

my $self->{message_types} = (
   type1 => sub { $self->sub_1(@_); },
   type2 => sub { $self->sub_2(@_); },
);
[download]

what would the call the dispatcher look like?

I tried:

$self->{message_types}->{$type}->(@args);
[download]

but as what I am doing is beyond my understanding of Perl hairiness, I wasn't suprised to find that it doesn't work. What would the correct code look like?

Thanks,

loris

"It took Loris ten minutes to eat a satsuma . . . twenty minutes to get from one end of his branch to the other . . . and an hour to scratch his bottom. But Slow Loris didn't care. He had a secret . . ."

Comment on Re^2: Dispatch table within package question Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Dispatch table within package question by ikegami (Patriarch) on Oct 07, 2005 at 14:55 UTC
Perl implements hashes such that lookups are extremely efficient. The size of the hash doesn't matter. Your syntax, `$self->{message_types}->{$type}->(@args);` [download] should be fine. What's the error? What's your code? Remember, that won't use the current value of $self, but the one $self had when the anonymous sub was created (assuming $self was a lexical (`my`) variable).	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Dispatch table within package question by loris (Hermit) on Oct 14, 2005 at 06:59 UTC
Sorry, you're right, it does work as you say. I had tried it out in an existing module with a whole lot of other gubbins with seemed mess things up (or at least prevent me from seeing clearly what I was doing). Thanks again for the help. loris "It took Loris ten minutes to eat a satsuma . . . twenty minutes to get from one end of his branch to the other . . . and an hour to scratch his bottom. But Slow Loris didn't care. He had a secret . . ."	[reply]