IMHO no.
In the first place I don't like excessive formatting. And indeed it seems to me that only a restricted subset of tags is really needed. For example <code> tags for... ehm... code, and then if you don't know that <em> is for emphasizing, who cares? You can still use ASCII-like emphasizing, a' la "_emphasizing_". You may learn gradually how to improve the visual appearance of your posts. Chances are that other monks will help you doing so.
For example often newbies want to stress that, say, if or for are keywords and do so by writing "IF" and "FOR" respectively. When I saw someone doing so I either /msg'ed them or included in my reply (if any) the recommendation to use inline <code> or <c> tags.
Then there are the linking shortcuts. I didn't know any in the beginning. I may have read the docs in the first place, but they seemed to me overly complex at first. I discovered them when indavertently writing [snip] in a quotation. Then I checked PerlMonks FAQ and I learned how to use them.
In short: KISS. And learn gradually! |