in reply to perl not omnipotent? let's see!
If we limit ourselves to algorithms, Perl Mouse is right with her/his statement.
If I recall my computatenol lectures correct, it's a prooven fact that a turing machine can compute any algorithm. So it's a fact that for any algorithm you can express in any computer language, there is a turing machine that is an implemantation for this algorithm.
If that statement is correct, and please correct me everyone who knows better, it's a fact that a perl program can compute any algorithm. It's simply a matter of implementing a turing machine in perl.
Agreed: It's very theoreticaly ;-)
s$$([},&%#}/&/]+}%&{})*;#$&&s&&$^X.($'^"%]=\&(|?*{%.+=%;.#_}\&"^"-+%*) +.}%:##%}={~=~:.")&e&&s""`$''`"e
|
|---|