in reply to Re^2: Test::More : I'd need a "not_ok()" function...
in thread Test::More : I'd need a "not_ok()" function...

I'm no expert on the internals of Test::More, but your method looks fine to me. I would follow the previous suggestion and call it die_ok or something similar. The maintainers usually have good opinions about the names.

Phil

  • Comment on Re^3: Test::More : I'd need a "not_ok()" function...