in reply to Perl Personalities

No comments about any famous Perl people.
Just the thought that this thread looks better suited for Meditations than the current Seekers of Perl Wisdom.

Would you consider, good monk georgebailey, submitting an Editor requests post along that vein?
    cheers,
    Don
    striving for Perl Adept
    (it's pronounced "why-bick")

p.s. Oh yeah, I almost forgot - welcome to the Monastery!   8^)

  • Comment on Re: Perl Personalities (Meditation instead of SOPW)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Perl Personalities (Meditation instead of SOPW)
by mrmick (Curate) on Jan 07, 2001 at 06:45 UTC
      Also, higher level monks should look twice before approving nodes.

      It's easy to skim a new post for clean markup and click "ok" before realizing it belongs in a different wing of the Monastery.   I know *I've* done that at least once.   8^(

      What if the approving monk had to select a PM section, even if just clicking over the poster's choice, before approval took effect?
          cheers,
          Don
          striving for Perl Adept
          (it's pronounced "why-bick")

(jptxs)Re: Re: Perl Personalities (Meditation instead of SOPW)
by jptxs (Curate) on Jan 07, 2001 at 20:55 UTC
    I have to say, this whole thread makes me sad. To see so many jump in the dogpile and some very high level monks too. At the very least this node should have been moved if not deleted entirely. The only thing which makes me reconsider is the part about ++ing or approving things which generate a lot of discussion, which this certianly has done. Seems to be an anomoly - I just hope it stays that way.

    my $.02

    "A man's maturity -- consists in having found again the seriousness one had as a child, at play." --Nietzsche