Re: I used to be a saint

Note that the saints are still saints, but now can continue up through the ranks in a rather more meaningfull fashion. I rather like seeing that I have only a three digit number of XP to go before attaining the next rank, rather than a 6 digit number as was the case until today.

BTW. How is it that three "senior" monks replied to OP's node without approving it? Surely they can't all have had their consideration rights taken away?

Perl is Huffman encoded by design.

Comment on Re: I used to be a saint

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: I used to be a saint by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Oct 31, 2005 at 01:50 UTC
Because I don't approve a node unless I, personally, approve of it and I don't frontpage a node unless I feel that inexperienced people definitely need to see this node (either as an example or a warning). But, then again, that's me. My criteria for good software: Does it work? Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?	[reply]
Re^3: I used to be a saint by thor (Priest) on Oct 31, 2005 at 12:32 UTC
Because I don't approve a node unless I, personally, approve of it I guess I don't see the grounds on which you disapprove of this kind of content... thor `Feel the white light, the light within Be your own disciple, fan the sparks of will For all of us waiting, your kingdom will come`	[reply]
Re^4: I used to be a saint by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Oct 31, 2005 at 13:29 UTC
I don't disapprove of the content. I just didn't find it so personally uplifting/moving that I chose to actively approve it. My criteria for good software: Does it work? Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?	[reply]