in reply to Re^3: An interesting quirk of the new order?
in thread An interesting quirk of the new order?

...my money is on the gremlins.

Okay, it's hardly important of itself, but given the recent changes, and that I have never seen it before, it could be indicative of a deeper problem. So I thought it worth reporting.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
  • Comment on Re^4: An interesting quirk of the new order?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: An interesting quirk of the new order?
by davido (Cardinal) on Nov 03, 2005 at 06:49 UTC

    I never said gremlins shouldn't be considered a deeper problem. ;)

    It is curious, actually. I just double-checked, and it doesn't look as though the code related to Other Users and pick_nodes has been touched lately.


    Dave

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion