Re^2: Regarding the recent node retitling sentiments

Exactly – I frequently find myself casting “keep” on considerations where I agree that the node could do with a better title, because the proposed new title is rather underwhelming.

Makeshifts last the longest.

Comment on Re^2: Regarding the recent node retitling sentiments

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Regarding the recent node retitling sentiments by Joost (Canon) on Nov 05, 2005 at 03:40 UTC
This is what I do too. My biggest gripe with that situation is that you can't suggest a "better" title if the node is already under consideration - the best you can do is wait for the node to become unconsidered and re-consider, which I think is just a waste of moderation time and probably not the best way to handle this kind of thing. I think that some way of suggesting and voting on alternative titles might help alleviate this problem somewhat. I don't know how effective it would be or how much work it would be to implement it and I'm not in pmdev anyway, so I can't make any assessment on whether it would be worth implementing that. On the other hand, IMHO most posts with bad titles aren't worth the effort of retitleing. :-) "What should it profit a man, if he should win a flame war, yet lose his cool?"	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: Regarding the recent node retitling sentiments
by Joost (Canon) on Nov 05, 2005 at 03:40 UTC

I think that some way of suggesting and voting on alternative titles might help alleviate this problem somewhat. I don't know how effective it would be or how much work it would be to implement it and I'm not in pmdev anyway, so I can't make any assessment on whether it would be worth implementing that.

On the other hand, IMHO most posts with bad titles aren't worth the effort of retitleing. :-)

"What should it profit a man, if he should win a flame war, yet lose his cool?"

[reply]