in reply to Troll Warning

Many replies seem to have missed the point that the proposal is for a heads up ahead of voting to avoid feeding trolls and to avoid wasting a vote on a node that has already received a hamering.

I guess for symetry you could set a "Billy Goat" (just to pick a name at random) threshold for highly rated nodes.

There are good reasons for not showing the rep for a node before you have voted on it. OP is not proposing a change to that. It is a change that you could adopt or not as you wish. It will have little effect on the normal operation of PerlMonks, and can lead to a large reduction in Troll like activity. Where's the down side?

P.S. I presume all the down voters in this thead are Trolls themselves :-)


DWIM is Perl's answer to Gödel

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Troll Warning
by shotgunefx (Parson) on Nov 17, 2005 at 22:22 UTC

    I haven't been that active here the last two years due to various outside things, but have trolls become that large a problem here?

    I still think that there's no such thing as a wasted vote.

    -Lee

    perl digital dash (in progress)