Re^4: Informal Poll: why aren't you using traits?

the pure-perl implementation has the highest overhead of course, but I find it the nicest overall language for developing custom object models.

I second that notion, Perl 5 is an excellent language for mucking about with object models. :)

Any chance this model will be released to CPAN, or at least just open source? I would be very interested in seeing it.

-stvn

Comment on Re^4: Informal Poll: why aren't you using traits?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Informal Poll: why aren't you using traits? by halley (Prior) on Nov 19, 2005 at 15:00 UTC
Any chance this model will be released to CPAN? Yes, eventually. Maybe even a book, as the concept of quality-oriented programming is only one of the weird non-traditional elements to my programming model. The issues here are completeness and performance analysis. I also want to release it with a useful and illustrative mini-library to help people get up to speed with the new concept. -- `[ e d @ h a l l e y . c c ]`	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^5: Informal Poll: why aren't you using traits?
by halley (Prior) on Nov 19, 2005 at 15:00 UTC

Any chance this model will be released to CPAN?

Yes, eventually. Maybe even a book, as the concept of quality-oriented programming is only one of the weird non-traditional elements to my programming model. The issues here are completeness and performance analysis. I also want to release it with a useful and illustrative mini-library to help people get up to speed with the new concept.

--
[ e d @ h a l l e y . c c ]

[reply]