in reply to Re^2: OT:Math problem: Grids and conical sections.
in thread OT:Math problem: Grids and conical sections.

I don't recognize your equation for the cone because you've introduced a variable z

Isn't jeffguy's cone equation a reordering of equation 5 on this Wolfram page?


Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
  • Comment on Re^3: OT:Math problem: Grids and conical sections.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: OT:Math problem: Grids and conical sections.
by tilly (Archbishop) on Nov 25, 2005 at 02:07 UTC
    Oh, so THAT's where he got it from.

    But he still can't just assume that the slope is 1. Let's take a concrete example and run a sanity check to demonstrate that.

    peak (1/2, 1/2), height 5, slope 2 point 1: bottom left 5 - 2*sqrt((3/2)**2 + (3/2)**2) = 0.757359312880715 point 2: bottom right 5 - 2*sqrt((1/2)**2 + (3/2)**2) = 1.83772233983162 point 3: top right 5 - 2*sqrt((1/2)**2 + (1/2)**2) = 3.58578643762691 point 4: top left 5 - 2*sqrt((3/2)**2 + (1/2)**2) = 1.83772233983162 a = 1.83772233983162 - 3.58578643762691 = -1.74806409779529 b = 0.757359312880715 - 3.58578643762691 = -2.8284271247462 c = 1.83772233983162 - 3.58578643762691 = -1.74806409779529 x = a(c-b)(a-c-b)/(4(a+c-b)) = -1.74806409779529 * (-1.74806409779529 - -2.8284271247462) * (-1.74806409779529 + -1.74806409779529 - -2.8284271247462) /( 4 * (-1.74806409779529 + -1.74806409779529 - -2.8284271247462) ) = -0.472135954999583
    and I'm not going to bother working out what he thinks that y should be since his value for x is already obviously wrong.