in reply to Re^2: What's so bad about &function(...)?
in thread What's so bad about &function(...)?
I'll bite. The second makes a copy of the array, the first doesn't. Right...? I hope. Or I've embarrassed myself terribly.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: What's so bad about &function(...)?
by Zaxo (Archbishop) on Dec 07, 2005 at 19:22 UTC |