Re^4: What's so bad about &function(...)?

Okay... so... uh... why the heck does Test::More use prototypes anyway?

-sauoq
"My two cents aren't worth a dime.";

Comment on Re^4: What's so bad about &function(...)? Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: What's so bad about &function(...)? by chromatic (Archbishop) on Dec 08, 2005 at 07:15 UTC
To catch bad tests by being very specific about functions such as `is()` and `like()` taking two, optionally three, arguments.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: What's so bad about &function(...)? by Ovid (Cardinal) on Dec 07, 2005 at 23:42 UTC
Didn't write it. You'll have to ask the authors. However, I don't mind it. More than once it's caught me writing a bad test and I can't recall any time I've been bitten by it. Cheers, Ovid New address of my CGI Course.	[reply]