Re: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider

I'd like it to be simpler yet... Like

()yes   ()no    ()null
[download]

If the consideration is to delete the node, then "yes" would mean "reap". Reap votes on nodes that haven't been considered for deletion are, I think, generally unnecessary.

P.S. I like "stumbit" too, but "nada" irks me.

-sauoq "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";

Comment on Re: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider by jdporter (Paladin) on Jan 05, 2006 at 15:53 UTC
Unfortunately, there are times when the consideration asks for, or allows for, both edit and reap as alternatives. Prime example: off-topic nodes. We're building the house of the future together.	[reply]
Re^3: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider by sauoq (Abbot) on Jan 05, 2006 at 16:01 UTC
So, let's just get rid of ambiguous considerations too. I really don't think off-topic nodes should be reaped in the vast majority of cases. Reaping is for trolls. OT posts should simply never be approved. (Though, marking them 'OT' might be reasonable as well.) `-sauoq "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";`	[reply]