Re^2: Any way to search for nodes by one monk in reply to another monk?

Thanks demerphq, regardless of whether it gets adopted.

I wasn't actually pushing for change, just wondering if anyone had worked out a way of doing it with the existing facilities.

That said, the number of times when I vaguely remember that a particular monk said something, either as a reply to me, or to which I remember replying, if this does become available it will be very useful. Often as not, these are small exchanges way down in a thread that have nothing whatever to do with the original subject, so the title of the thread doesn't stick in ones memory.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^2: Any way to search for nodes by one monk in reply to another monk?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Any way to search for nodes by one monk in reply to another monk? by demerphq (Chancellor) on Jan 16, 2006 at 22:10 UTC
After a couple of tweaks tye asked me to apply it. Now you can help test it. :-) --- $world=~s/war/peace/g	[reply]
Re^4: Any way to search for nodes by one monk in reply to another monk? by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 16, 2006 at 23:29 UTC
What can I say. The new option on Super Search appears to work perfectly. Thankyou++. If other people go looking for things [somemonk] said, in response to something [someothermonk] said, as often as I do, this oought to see server loads drop significantly as they & I will be able to zero in on what we are looking for considerably more quickly. Again, many thanks. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal? "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]