Re^5: OO in Perl 5: still inadequate

in reply to Re^4: OO in Perl 5: still inadequate
in thread OO in Perl 5: still inadequate

Yes. There's an implicit requirement on the classes we're discussing to be subclassable in the first place, otherwise the discussion is pointless. We may as be talking about the number of vertices in polygons and allowing polygons to include circles.

s/\bclass\b/class (which must be subclassable to start with)/g
[download]

Comment on Re^5: OO in Perl 5: still inadequate Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: OO in Perl 5: still inadequate by brian_d_foy (Abbot) on Jan 21, 2006 at 17:30 UTC
If you limit the set of classes your claim applies to, you can't use the word "any". Your bold claim is too bold :) -- brian d foy <brian@stonehenge.com> Subscribe to The Perl Review	[reply]

In Section Meditations