Re: Params::Validate - a powerful tool for robust subroutine design

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Params::Validate - a powerful tool for robust subroutine design by jdporter (Paladin) on Jan 24, 2006 at 22:59 UTC
Perl Best Practices does not recommend Params::Validate Ah... argument from authority. Gotta love it. So pure, so simple.	[reply]
Re^2: Params::Validate - a powerful tool for robust subroutine design by autarch (Hermit) on Jan 25, 2006 at 04:05 UTC
Good point, I'll delete it off CPAN right now.	[reply]
Re^3: Params::Validate - a powerful tool for robust subroutine design by rhesa (Vicar) on Jan 25, 2006 at 20:03 UTC
PBP does not recommend you should do that. Better leave it in place :)	[reply]
Re^4: Params::Validate - a powerful tool for robust subroutine design by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jan 25, 2006 at 20:07 UTC
Taking PBP as an authority is not a best practice according to PBP. `:-)` Makeshifts last the longest.	[reply]
Re^2: Params::Validate - a powerful tool for robust subroutine design by shenme (Priest) on Aug 18, 2006 at 22:42 UTC
It doesn't _not_ recommend it either. It doesn't mention it - not something that can be extrapolated. In fact PBP says very little on the subject of parameter validation, only mentioning the idea in one section, Ch.9 "Argument lists". I was struck by this meager discussion of the subject. (Re-reading PBP again - on my list of yearly redos)	[reply]