Re^2: Double voting (to get better answers as well?)

Ok. Got your message :)

"We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on when it's necessary to compromise." - Larry Wall.

Comment on Re^2: Double voting (to get better answers as well?)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Double voting (to get better answers as well?) by davido (Cardinal) on Jan 30, 2006 at 07:33 UTC
No harm, no foul. ;) Thanks though! By the way, I do think your arguments for double-votes on nodes are reasonable. There have been plenty of times where I've wished that I could give two plus votes to a node that I really liked. But ultimately I still disagree that it's necessary. lol. It makes for interesting discussion though, so ++,++ to your original post. ;) Dave	[reply]