in reply to Re: letting a browser client select a file to download by inode
in thread letting a browser client select a file to download by inode
Yes indeed. Mounting and umount ing.. Great hell fun that was. A lot of the junk we serve will possibly be on .. guess what.. ntfs.. yeah.
I want to support this kind of activity (renaming via fs and keeping db reliable) - but i just see no way. with reg files, i use md5sums.. and that's a charm. But with directories ? oh boy..
if a mounted section of the data being served is umount ed, then changes happen, dirs get renamed.. and it gets mounted again a day later.. i'm screwed!
|
|---|