in reply to Re: Mod_Perl tutorial
in thread Mod_Perl tutorial

This node falls below the community's minimum standard of quality and will not be displayed.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Mod_Perl tutorial
by brian_d_foy (Abbot) on Feb 02, 2006 at 09:39 UTC

    When you're new to a subject or can't judge the quality of information on your own, Google might not be that helpful. Indeed, there are plenty of crappy perl tutorials that are easy to find.

    You aren't doing their work for them if they ask you where to get the docs and you tell them. You don't want to waste your time telling him where to look, but you'll post about how he doesn't meet your standards. Don't be a jerk.

    Let's all play nice and friendly. If we made everyone find out things on their own, then we wouldn't need Perlmonks. If you don't like helping people, don't post. There are plenty of us who are much more willing to be nice to the newbies.

    --
    brian d foy <brian@stonehenge.com>
    Subscribe to The Perl Review
      I agree that quality information can be tricky to find.

      I guess I came across harsher than I intended to sound like. Maybe it's my mentality that I prefer to ask only very rarely.

      I didn't say that I would be wasting my time, as I wrote I considered helping. The only reason I posted a reply to tirwhan, after I've seen he replied the question already, is that I know people are more willing to help if the one asking did what he could and says so.

      I have no problems with helping. I didn't suggest that people should find out things on their own only, just that asking things better could lead to better replies.

      Btw, I'm generally a friendly person. I'm new here too at PM, so I guess people just don't know me yet.
      A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^3: Mod_Perl tutorial
by tirwhan (Abbot) on Feb 02, 2006 at 09:26 UTC

    Well, whatever you feel appropriate. Personally, putting these two resources into a reply was little to no effort. Not everyone is as comfortable with Google as you or I seem to be and if someone is new to Perl they may not be aware of the mod_perl site. Pointing it out to them is beneficial to both them and the rest of PM, because a lot of questions that would otherwise have ended up here can be answered by reading that site.

    I'm not saying you're wrong and I might react the same way on a different day, but we do aim to provide a newbie-friendly face to PM (I think), which sometimes means giving answers to imperfect questions.


    There are ten types of people: those that understand binary and those that don't.
Re^3: Mod_Perl tutorial
by pajout (Curate) on Feb 02, 2006 at 10:00 UTC
    Yes and no,
    it is googleable, of course, but people is able to filter it and to advice subjectively good things... I am not sure that google internal weights can do it...
Re^3: Mod_Perl tutorial
by gregor42 (Parson) on Feb 02, 2006 at 14:53 UTC
    I considered replying...decided not to...could have been found by using Google for five seconds

    Don't you think it's beneficial to have it appear in SuperSearch now also, as a result of this thread?

    Isn't that the point of this site? If answering simple questions is beneith you then why respond at all?

    Let us consider for a moment that this was not an attempt to do someone's homework for them, but rather to point them towards the resources they need to do it themselves. How is such a response not appropriate?

    If someone says to you "How do I get to the library from here, I have a term paper due?" does that imply that they want you to do the paper for them? Do you refuse to give them directions?

    I suppose it could be argued that in doing so you're forcing them to be more self-reliant. However IMHO such 'tough love' is the role of a parent/mentor, not that of a community promoting knowledge.



    Wait! This isn't a Parachute, this is a Backpack!
      "Don't you think it's beneficial to have it appear in SuperSearch now also, as a result of this thread?"

      I just checked Super Search. There are two different threads with exactly the same title and content. I guess it could be argued that they got outdated since 2001, but as far as I checked it the links were roughly the same and that was not the point you were arguing.

      As for the rest of your post please read my reply here.