in reply to 2, 2, 2, 3, 7, 22, 83, ...

This use of Western-oriented numbers is clearly introducing a bias and hurting women and minorities! It shows a clear exclusionism on the behalf of those who can count past ten without removing shoes and/or trousers, except for poor white trash who deserve what they get, and as such I demand a tax on NASCAR to pay for massive government programs that pretend to help the allegedly repressed and in reality give unfirable jobs to the unemployable idiot liberal arts children of the middle and upper classes.

Sincerely,
Moonbeam Smithers-Jones
Chair, Harvard Departement of Idiocy Studies

--
tbone1, YAPS (Yet Another Perl Schlub)
And remember, if he succeeds, so what.
- Chick McGee

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: 2, 2, 2, 3, 7, 22, 83, ...
by swampyankee (Parson) on Feb 06, 2006 at 17:42 UTC

    But wait...these numbers are Eastern Hindu-Arabic numerals, obviously showing an anti-Western, anti-Christian bias in the questioner.

    Obviously the questioner is a member of the anti-American East Coast, Liberal elite.

    emc

    " When in doubt, use brute force." — Ken Thompson
[reply]
      And, just as obviously, I've got to quit sniffing this Ajax. Unfortunately, it's the only way I can get through most days' meetings.

      --
      tbone1, YAPS (Yet Another Perl Schlub)
      And remember, if he succeeds, so what.
      - Chick McGee

[reply]

In Section Past Polls