in reply to BASIC hajp

Basically, you wrote it so BASIC_COMMENT is PERL_CODE while BASIC_CODE is PERL_COMMENT... Both parts are distinct: remove the Perl code and the BASIC works pretty well.

This is the first step into polyglots, but don't stop here.

Next, you can try using the variable q$ in BASIC, which will allow you to hide a little BASIC into a Perl quoted-string... Then you begin to intermix the two languages. That is where the real fun part begins.

Until you reach a point where every part of the code is essential. When you're stuck with your code, and it's just... beautyful. Like a work by M. C. Escher.

Of all aspects of writing polyglots, this is the best, ever... (soooorry, couldn't help)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: BASIC hajp
by kschwab (Vicar) on Jan 19, 2001 at 01:02 UTC
    Well, sort of. The BASIC can stand alone, but the Perl is something of a fragile/one-off/single purpose BASIC interpreter. So, the BASIC works without the Perl, but the Perl doesn't work without the BASIC.

    I like the q$ idea...perhaps I can get more than 1/2 a polyglot next time.

    Thanks for the feedback...

    Update: I added something a bit closer to a polygot on the original node. Thanks BooK !