Well, then I guess it's a bug since then it should probably emit a parser error.
But note that this works:
sub CLASS_DEFINITION:
ATTRIBUTES:
PRIVATE: pvt_at1 pvt_at2 pvt_at3
PROTECTED: ptc_at1 ptc_at2 ptc_at3
PUBLIC: pub_at1 pub_at2 pub_at3
METHODS:
PRIVATE: pvt_mt1 pvt_mt2 pvt_mt3
PROTECTED: ptc_mt1 ptc_mt2 ptc_mt3
PUBLIC: pub_mt1 pub_mt2 pub_mt3
;
code edited: missing ':'
It gets interpreted to a lot of attributes. And it spans multiple lines.
Just a side note, but I actually wrote code that handles this sort of attribute depiction and creates the accessors methods and such.
Somehow, yesterday this all seemed like a very good idea but today it seems like a brain-dead way to do things.
But I'm still curious about all of this. Should I report it as a bug or something like that?
acid06
perl -e "print pack('h*', 16369646), scalar reverse $="
|