Re^3: A work of art

Ya sure. I disagree. Oh well? %fields isn't named like it's supposed to provide defaults, it's named like the author intended it to be more local. If the thing really is some defaults then it ought to look like it. It's not good code, as is.

⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊

Comment on Re^3: A work of art

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: A work of art by Anonymous Monk on Feb 14, 2006 at 19:07 UTC
As a work of modern art, it must have been intended to be ugly, flawed, and comment-provoking. ;-) -- Ytrew, who really doesn't get modern art...	[reply]
Re^5: A work of art by turo (Friar) on Feb 15, 2006 at 10:18 UTC
... perl-cubism? or perl-expresionism? ... `perl -Te 'print map { chr((ord)-((10,20,2,7)[$i++])) } split //,"turo"'`	[reply] [d/l]