in reply to Re: mod_perl & BerkeleyDB. Need help.
in thread mod_perl & BerkeleyDB. Need help.

I don't think so... Right me. We have a mod_perl. And we have a 25 httpd process. We in MyMemory.pm make "tie %h ..." (once). We have a one connection in BerkeleyDB (imho). If we a put "tie %h ..." in get & set subs - we a get a many connections? ICQ UIN 41960352 Knock Knock please. We realy a need help & consultation.
  • Comment on Re^2: mod_perl & BerkeleyDB. Need help.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: mod_perl & BerkeleyDB. Need help.
by perrin (Chancellor) on Feb 16, 2006 at 19:54 UTC
    I don't do chat. If you want to ask more questions, ask them here. I'm not sure why you think 25 "connections" to BerkeleyDB is a bad thing. There are no sockets and there is no server -- BerkeleyDB is a library. The only limitation should be running out of filehandles on your operating system.
[reply]
      I look for chat... because I not very good a English... & in ICQ I fastest find answer to my quesions. So, 25 connections - no bad... I know. But if we a "tie %h ..." in get & set subs - we make connections when use a get_memory & set_memory subs... It's a thousands connection per hour... imho. Right me.
[reply]
        There's no need to tie in each sub. You can tie once in each process and just keep it open. You need to use BerkeleyDB's locking. Look at the example code I pointed you to.
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom