Re^2: next statement logic

Thank you all for your prompt response. Few comments to your questions: "izut: Can't figure out why you are printing in the end of the loop..." At the end, I want to print everything that doesn't exist in hash1 or hash2 into OUTPUT1.
"QM: Also, your description is confusing, as you mention %hash3, but %hash3 never shows up in the code." I apologize for the confusion...it's actually just hash1 and hash2 (I think I mentioned these as hash2 and hash3 elsewhere, but ignore this)
Here's an illustration of what I'm trying to achieve...I hope this helps.
DATA:

hash1:
ABC123
ABC456

hash2:
ABC456

Main File1:
ABC123
ABC456
XYZ123
XYZ456

OUTPUT1:
ABC123
ABC456
XYZ123 ###values not found in hash1 or hash2 will go to OUTPUT1
XYZ456

OUTPUT2:
ABC456
[download]

Comment on Re^2: next statement logic Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: next statement logic by QM (Parson) on Feb 20, 2006 at 19:25 UTC
If that is an example of what you want to achieve, here is the logic to follow: 1) Everything is printed to `OUTPUT1`, including anything that matches in either `%hash1` or `%hash2`. 2) Anything found in `%hash2` should also be printed to `OUTPUT2`. If I have that correct, then my example should be changed to the following: `while ($line = <MAIN_FILE1>){ chomp $line; print OUTPUT1 "$filename\n"; if (exists $hash2{$entry}) { print OUTPUT2 "$filename\n"; } } close(MAIN_FILE1)` [download] Note that no `next` statement is needed, regardless of the order of `print/if`. -QM -- Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: next statement logic by Not_a_Number (Prior) on Feb 20, 2006 at 20:13 UTC
Dear OP, As you see, we are still confused, even after your update. QM has interpreted your requirements as above. My solution, below, interprets them as follows: 1) Anything found in `%hash1` should be printed to `OUTPUT1`. 2) Anything found in `%hash2` should be printed to `OUTPUT2`. 3) Anything found in both hashes should be printed to both `OUTPUT1` and `OUTPUT2`. 4) Anything found in neither hash should be printed to `OUTPUT1`. Which of these interpretations is yours? (If we've both still misunderstood, please try to be very clear in your answer :).	[reply] [d/l] [select]