in reply to Re^2: RFC: Should join subsume reduce?
in thread RFC: Should join subsume reduce?
In fact, the argument is not just a no-op, it contradicts the sentiment: List::Util has been in core since 5.7.3 (to be precise), whereas this newfangled join would only appear in some future version of Perl – so if you wanted broader coverage, you’d use reduce anyway.
Makeshifts last the longest.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: RFC: Should join subsume reduce?
by Roy Johnson (Monsignor) on Feb 23, 2006 at 18:13 UTC | |
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Feb 23, 2006 at 19:08 UTC | |
by Roy Johnson (Monsignor) on Feb 23, 2006 at 20:09 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 23, 2006 at 18:24 UTC | |
by MidLifeXis (Monsignor) on Feb 23, 2006 at 18:45 UTC |