in reply to Re^3: Help me make a test case for Math::BigFloat
in thread Help me make a test case for Math::BigFloat
Good idea - thanks.
I eventually did find a way to simplify the math, and here's the test case I sent off:
Note that by futzing with the $lnev number, you can get this bug to disappear - for example, by changing the "7" to a "1".#!perl use strict; use warnings; use Test::More tests => 4; use bignum; my $lnev = -7 / (10**17); my $ev=exp($lnev); is( sprintf('%0.5f',$ev) , '1.00000', '($ev) is approx. 1' ); is( sprintf('%0.5f',1-$ev) , '0.00000', '(1-$ev) is approx. 0' ); is( sprintf('%0.5f',1-"$ev") , '0.00000', '(1-"$ev") is approx. 0' ); cmp_ok( $ev, '!=', 0, '$ev should not equal 0');
@/=map{[/./g]}qw/.h_nJ Xapou cets krht ele_ r_ra/; map{y/X_/\n /;print}map{pop@$_}@/for@/
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^5: Help me make a test case for Math::BigFloat
by xdg (Monsignor) on Mar 06, 2006 at 21:53 UTC |