in reply to Object-relational Recommendations

I'm currently working on a new Object datastore built on DBM::Deep that will provide near-transparent persistence for objects. While this won't scale into the Ebays of the world, it will do nicely for 90% of the apps that currently use an ORM.

If you're interested, I can have an alpha version up in a week or so.

My criteria for good software:
  1. Does it work?
  2. Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Object-relational Recommendations
by Ovid (Cardinal) on Mar 08, 2006 at 19:24 UTC

    I am definitely interested. While scalability is important, that applies to developer productivity as well as raw performance. Plus, I view it as only one of many considerations. The fastest, easiest to use ORM is useless if it doesn't run on the DBMS I'm using, if it's so buggy that it's unreliable, or if I can't retrofit it to pre-existing schemas.

    Cheers,
    Ovid

    New address of my CGI Course.

[reply]
      Presto won't run on an RDBMS. It runs on DBM::Deep. It will have a query structure, but there will be no SQL anywhere near this thing.
      My criteria for good software:
      1. Does it work?
      2. Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom