in reply to Re^5: perl6 or not perl6 ...
in thread perl6 or not perl6 ...

Really, if you think the Perl 6 we have now should have been called something other than Perl 6, then what kind of language should have been called Perl 6?

That's a very interesting one, but only answer I can honestly give is that Perl's time is up. It has been for a few years. Perl 6 could be a rewrite of Perl 5 with some extra features, for those fanatics who keep using the language.

Update: Wrote that when I was in a bad mood. I probably shouldn't have written it, even though it does reflect how I often feel about Perl.

Juerd # { site => 'juerd.nl', plp_site => 'plp.juerd.nl', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: perl6 or not perl6 ...
by TimToady (Parson) on Mar 14, 2006 at 02:19 UTC
    If Perl's time is up then obviously it's getting less important and we would do better to rehuffmanize its name to something longer like, say, Perl 5.10 or some such...

    But hey, that just frees up the perfectly good four-letter word "Perl" for other uses. :-)