in reply to Re^5: perl6 or not perl6 ...
in thread perl6 or not perl6 ...
Really, if you think the Perl 6 we have now should have been called something other than Perl 6, then what kind of language should have been called Perl 6?
That's a very interesting one, but only answer I can honestly give is that Perl's time is up. It has been for a few years. Perl 6 could be a rewrite of Perl 5 with some extra features, for those fanatics who keep using the language.
Update: Wrote that when I was in a bad mood. I probably shouldn't have written it, even though it does reflect how I often feel about Perl.
Juerd # { site => 'juerd.nl', plp_site => 'plp.juerd.nl', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^7: perl6 or not perl6 ...
by TimToady (Parson) on Mar 14, 2006 at 02:19 UTC |