Dunx has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
I've been using time, but that only produces times to the nearest second, which is pretty coarse these days.
The reason I ask is that I'd like a sequential GUID value for user input from a web form which doesn't involve using a single file to hold next value (cf the flock example in the Perl Cookbook) - using the posting time seems like a sensible, bottle-neck free, approach.
Dunx
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Sub-second Timing in Timestamps
by httptech (Chaplain) on Mar 14, 2000 at 23:10 UTC | |
|
Re: Sub-second Timing in Timestamps
by turnstep (Parson) on Mar 24, 2000 at 23:57 UTC | |
|
RE: Sub-second Timing in Timestamps
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 14, 2000 at 23:36 UTC | |
|
Re: Sub-second Timing in Timestamps
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 15, 2000 at 02:06 UTC |