in reply to Interfaces for the masses!

While I completely agree with Tanktalus previous (rather long) post, I don't think the concept of interface is completely useless in the Perl world.

I think it'd be nice if there were some kind of "soft" or "advisory" interfaces. They wouldn't force anything, they'd be just a standard way of querying if the module implements a well defined set of functions.

An appropriate name for this would be UNIVERSAL::implements, so you'd be able to query classes for some specific behaviour like:
if (Class->implements('interface')) { # do stuff }
Then you'd have a way of each class to specify which interfaces they implement and a simple way of defining these interfaces. It would be just a well specified way of programming by contract.

I think this sounds like a reasonable idea, but might just be overkill. I don't really know.

I just wanted to note that I think this is one of the true beauties of Perl: in other languages this discussion probably wouldn't even exist since it'd be something impossible to do.

Update: typo fixed.


acid06
perl -e "print pack('h*', 16369646), scalar reverse $="

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Interfaces for the masses!
by adrianh (Chancellor) on Mar 26, 2006 at 15:02 UTC
    An appropriate name for this would be UNIVERSAL::implements, so you'd be able to query classes for some specific behaviour...

    With Class::Trait you'd do:

    if ( eval { Class->does( 'interface' ) } ) { # do stuff }
Re^2: Interfaces for the masses!
by rvosa (Curate) on Mar 24, 2006 at 01:30 UTC
    Then you'd have a have of each class specifying which interfaces they implement and a simple way of defining these interfaces.
    Do you mind clarifying the typo? I was just getting into your post and now it feels like I'm missing the punchline.