Re^5: Re-blessing || Re-constructing objects

It can't be done without breaking encapsulation. All of your examples require a class to know all about the internals of some other class. You may decide that's okay in your case, but it still loses the abstraction.

Comment on Re^5: Re-blessing \|\| Re-constructing objects

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Re-blessing \|\| Re-constructing objects by demerphq (Chancellor) on Apr 18, 2006 at 21:30 UTC
Just out of curiousity do you consider "friend" classes to violate encapsulation? --- $world=~s/war/peace/g	[reply]
Re^6: Re-blessing \|\| Re-constructing objects by salva (Canon) on Apr 18, 2006 at 19:03 UTC
No. In my sample code there is only one class.	[reply]
Re^7: Re-blessing \|\| Re-constructing objects by perrin (Chancellor) on Apr 18, 2006 at 19:45 UTC
Putting them all in one file doesn't make them one class.	[reply]
Re^8: Re-blessing \|\| Re-constructing objects by salva (Canon) on Apr 18, 2006 at 20:00 UTC
you can break it in 50 files and it will continue to be an only class	[reply]