Re^2: Some Tk::TableMatrix and Tk::MListbox excentricities

thanks for the hint. Sounds really usefull (at least when i am coding for personal use). Unfortunately i doubt that it will be of use when i'm coding for my company, as it must be possible to compile my perlscripts with perlapp (from Activestate), and i doubt that the compiled version would work when using Tcl::Tk.
Still - sounds excellent for my personal use, thanks.

Comment on Re^2: Some Tk::TableMatrix and Tk::MListbox excentricities

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Some Tk::TableMatrix and Tk::MListbox excentricities by vkon (Curate) on Apr 21, 2006 at 17:17 UTC
Yes, I didn't tried perlapp with Tcl::Tk, because ... I used my own packagin system, for some reasons. Due to simplicity of Tcl::Tk, packaging Tcl::Tk itself would be easier than perl/Tk, but harder part is packaging Tcl/Tk (it has its own packager, but I don't know if these two work together) If this still subject of interest for you (and other users) I can try asking ActiveState people questions like this. BR, vkon	[reply]
Re^4: Some Tk::TableMatrix and Tk::MListbox excentricities by rminner (Chaplain) on Apr 21, 2006 at 19:18 UTC
If it would be possible to compile Tcl::Tk , it would be definitely enriching as it would drastically increase the amount of widgets available for coding. So - yes, if you could get that to work, i would definitely be interested in how you did it.	[reply]