in reply to Re: RFC: PerlMonks "What's New" Wiki
in thread RFC: PerlMonks "What's New" Wiki
Or we could do something that is user friendly.
Update: Sorry, that was entirely too flip. Yes, your solution has a user friendliness element. However, I don't see that it is as close to an ideal solution as my proposal. (a) Announcements would still be scattered among the other PMDs. This isn't bad, but it isn't ideal (IMHO). (b) As PMDs, announcements could be replied to by monks. I think they shouldn't be susceptible to this kind of cluttering influence.* (c) All Monks will able to post a node that looks like an announcement. Yes, the janitors can go clean up such messes, but it would be better to prevent them in the first place... especially when an RSS feed is involved, and other caching issues.
* It will happen. It's like a law of nature. For example, I posted XY Problem with the intention that it serve as a kind of unofficial reference document. I didn't want votes, and I didn't want replies. I got lots of both. For me this was an unpleasant learning experience. In hindsight, I probably should have posted it as a sitefaqlet; but I asked people's opinions on this first, and most were opposed.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: RFC: PerlMonks "What's New" Wiki
by eric256 (Parson) on Apr 24, 2006 at 20:35 UTC | |
by tye (Sage) on Apr 24, 2006 at 20:58 UTC | |
|
Re^3: RFC: PerlMonks "What's New" Wiki
by eric256 (Parson) on Apr 24, 2006 at 19:30 UTC |