in reply to Re: RFC: Data::Sync
in thread RFC: Data::Sync
As far as I know, the recommended approach to change detection in LDAP these days (since no two directory vendors ever managed to agree on a changelog standard) is persistent searching.
There are two ways of doing this using Data::Sync as it stands:
The latter approach has been tested, but is a hefty search overhead. The former works in theory, but hasn't been tested (I have only very recently got a fully v3 compliant DS set up for testing).
An alternative approach (and the one I would favour for simplicity I think) would be to read LDIF as if it were an LDAP server - the code extensions to do that are fairly simple. That way your code could read the changelog file to pick up changes, perform the remapping, and write them direct to the target DS.
The code changes for that are fairly straightforward, and would be very useful in any case - thanks for the suggestion.
--------------------------------------------------------------
"If there is such a phenomenon as absolute evil, it consists in treating another human being as a thing."
John Brunner, "The Shockwave Rider".
Can you spare 2 minutes to help with my research? If so, please click here
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: RFC: Data::Sync
by mantadin (Beadle) on Apr 26, 2006 at 09:57 UTC |