in reply to Safer CGI at SysAdmin

This is not really a complaint, just a point. Mod_perl when setup right is almost as fast as a C CGI script. Your final section recommended using perl if perl could so the job fast enough, because of the extra security features, or use C otherwise. I disagree - not because I think you are wrong, I jsut feel that your comments are a few years out of date. I suggest that mod_perl should be used if a simple CGI script cannot work fast. I don't suggest this because I am anti-c or pro-perl but because C is much harder to make secure than perl.

When I was a pure C coder (a few years back now) there was some call for using C as a CGI language. In fact, my first forays into web design were written in C. These days I would never consider using C, the thought of reinventing the security wheel every time you write a script, and for no apparent gain doen't appeal to me.

The one thing I really want to point out is this is not an attack on your article.... I wish I had had something like that to read while I was working as a webmaster ;)

$japh->{'Caillte'} = $me;

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: (2) Safer CGI at SysAdmin (wish it were my article 8^)
by ybiC (Prior) on Jan 26, 2001 at 23:28 UTC
    Wow, Caillte, I wish I were smart enough to have written that article! {grin} I just read it, learned a few things, and hoped to find out what other monks thought about it.

    "C is much harder to secure than Perl..."
    See, there I learned yet another tidbit about (gasp) C.   BTW, your comments don't sound complaining or attacking to me.
        cheers,
        Don
        striving for Perl Adept
        (it's pronounced "why-bick")