Is there a graphical CPAN installer?

rinceWind has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

I've been getting into Debian recently, and have been impressed by synaptic: how easy it is to view the status of packages, browse dependencies and request packages to be installed.

This got me thinking about CPAN. It would be really neat if a similar tool was available. In fact, I'm interested in writing one if one doesn't exist. So, my first question is "has anyone done this before?"

Any pointers to relevant hosted svn/cvs or sourceforge/freshmeat projects would be welcome. Even if it's rubbish, it would still be helpful to learn from; otherwise I'll assume I'm starting from square zero.

The second question I'm interested in is: "What user interfaces I should provide?"

GUI synaptic style, written in pTk.
Curses interface, aptitude style. This would be useful for remote ssh connections.
HTML web browser interface. This could be CGI or mod_perl.

Any feedback would be most welcome.

--

Oh Lord, won’t you burn me a Knoppix CD ?
My friends all rate Windows, I must disagree.
Your powers of persuasion will set them all free,
So oh Lord, won’t you burn me a Knoppix CD ?
(Missquoting Janis Joplin)

Comment on Is there a graphical CPAN installer?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Is there a graphical CPAN installer? by gellyfish (Monsignor) on Apr 28, 2006 at 10:22 UTC
CPANPLUS has a Tk shell /J\	[reply]
Re^2: Is there a graphical CPAN installer? by rinceWind (Monsignor) on Apr 29, 2006 at 10:12 UTC
This seems broken. It seems to want to use CPANPLUS::I18N which has been removed from the CPANPLUS distribution. I'm reluctant to downgrade to a version of CPANPLUS that has this submodule. However, it may be a start if I look at the code... -- Oh Lord, won’t you burn me a Knoppix CD ? My friends all rate Windows, I must disagree. Your powers of persuasion will set them all free, So oh Lord, won’t you burn me a Knoppix CD ? (Missquoting Janis Joplin)	[reply]
Re: Is there a graphical CPAN installer? by jonadab (Parson) on Apr 28, 2006 at 13:01 UTC
Part of the reason that Debian needs Synaptic is because the Debian package distribution and installation system is, quite frankly, not CPAN. Among other things, the configuration system built into CPAN.pm is really quite good, and something that Linux distributions (on both sides of the deb/rpm divide) would do well to have a good hard look at. Just for example, selecting CPAN mirrors is a good deal more straightforward, and requires a good deal less up-front knowledge the first time, than adding package sources in Synaptic, to say nothing of the command-line interface to apt. You answer a couple of easy multiple-choice questions about where you are located, and it shows you a list of mirrors, and you pick some of them. I wish it were that easy in Synaptic (or rpmdrake)! This is not to say that a GUI interface to the CPAN couldn't be worthwhile. It could be, if done really well. A tree interface for browsing available modules might have potential, for instance, perhaps with POD info about the selected module in another pane. It also might be interesting to be able to select a module and get a tree view of its dependencies, with ones you don't have expanded by default, but the ability to expand even the ones you do have and see the whole tree. And, going a step further, it ought to be possible to select a module in that tree and set options (such as don't run the tests) for installing it. However, just trying to clone Synaptic but hook it up to the CPAN instead of the deb package system is not, IMO, going to be useful. Much of the way Synaptic is designed is inherently tied to the way the Debian package system is designed, which is rather different from the CPAN. Frankly the Gentoo portage system is more similar to the CPAN than the Debian system is. Sanity? Oh, yeah, I've got all kinds of sanity. In fact, I've developed whole new kinds of sanity. Why, I've got so much sanity it's driving me crazy.	[reply]