in reply to Re^4: Counting the number of items returned by split without using a named array
in thread Counting the number of items returned by split without using a named array

D'Oh! I forgot to -w when I tested it. It's incredible how annoying this little thing can be!!! All in all I would regard the assignment to @_ and the connected warning as spurious, since split is not called in void context. But... they're there!

  • Comment on Re^5: Counting the number of items returned by split without using a named array
  • Download Code