in reply to Re^2: Counting the number of items returned by split without using a named array
in thread Counting the number of items returned by split without using a named array

I know that of course. It is just one quick n dirty way to count blanks (therefore the "e.g." ). but the goatse thing is nicer, i must admit
  • Comment on Re^3: Counting the number of items returned by split without using a named array