Re^2: Counting the number of items returned by split without using a named array

Hm, sorry to have asked, as I see the two prominent solutions to the problem had already been discussed here
(hope linking works as expected now, preview was fine... if not: was meant to link here http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=527973) I.

Comment on Re^2: Counting the number of items returned by split without using a named array

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Counting the number of items returned by split without using a named array by blazar (Canon) on May 04, 2006 at 09:00 UTC
You should not be sorry. Even if the topic seems trivial and elementary, it turned out to be more complex than one would probably think, and thus the discussion has been very interesting. BTW: to insert a link you should use `[id://527973]` or `[id://527973\|here]`, which render like Perl Idioms Explained - my $count = () = /.../g and here respectively. This is the preferred way since they will bring up the correct link both if you're in http://perlmonks.org and http://www.perlmonks.org, or any other possible mirror. See this node for more info.	[reply] [d/l] [select]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: Counting the number of items returned by split without using a named array
by blazar (Canon) on May 04, 2006 at 09:00 UTC

You should not be sorry. Even if the topic seems trivial and elementary, it turned out to be more complex than one would probably think, and thus the discussion has been very interesting.

BTW: to insert a link you should use [id://527973] or [id://527973|here], which render like Perl Idioms Explained - my $count = () = /.../g and here respectively. This is the preferred way since they will bring up the correct link both if you're in http://perlmonks.org and http://www.perlmonks.org, or any other possible mirror. See this node for more info.

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]